氢经济展望与电解水制氢技术经济性分析

摘要绿氢被视为最有前景的清洁能源载体,在可再生清洁能源存储与利用环节中起到关键性作用。但绿氢制取的技术多元化特征导致"氢经济"发展过程中存在资源分散、重复建设等隐患,不利于相关产业的高效发展。通过系统性的总结与对比不同电解水制氢技术路线的优缺点及其技术经济性,以及该领域目前的产业化发展水平,为电解水制氢领域的技术走向与市场化布局提供参考。

	Service

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	Email Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	武晓彤
	谭磊
	郑越源
	林超
	肖琪
	李小鹏

关键词：电解水氢能经济技术经济性分析

Abstract： Green hydrogen is recognized as the most promising clean energy carrier, playing a role in the storage and utilization of renewable clean energy. However, the diverse nature of green hydrogen production technologies presents certain challenges, such as resource dispersion and redundant construction within the "hydrogen economy" development. These challenges hinder the efficient progress of related industries. To address these issues, this review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis by systematically summarizing and comparing the advantages, disadvantages and techno-economic analysis of various technical pathways for hydrogen production from water electrolysis. Additionally, the current level of industrialization in this field has been assessed. The findings of this review serve as a valuable reference for understanding the technical trends and market-oriented strategies for electrolysis-based hydrogen production.

Keywords： water electrolysis hydrogen economy techno-economic analysis

Received 2023-09-30;

Fund:国家自然科学基金(52272289)。

Corresponding Authors: 李小鹏,研究员,E-mail:xiaopeng.li@dhu.edu.cn。 Email: xiaopeng.li@dhu.edu.cn

About author: 武晓彤(1998-),博士研究生,现从事电解水制氢催化剂研究。

引用本文:

武晓彤, 谭磊, 郑越源, 林超, 肖琪, 李小鹏.氢经济展望与电解水制氢技术经济性分析[J]. 化学工业与工程, 2024,41(2): 131-140

WU Xiaotong, TAN Lei, ZHENG Yueyuan, LIN Chao, XIAO Qi, LI Xiaopeng.Outlook on hydrogen economy and techno-economic assessment of water electrolysis-based hydrogen production[J]. Chemcial Industry and Engineering, 2024,41(2): 131-140

[1] Fraunhofer Institute. Fraunhofer presents hydrogen roadmap for Germany[Z]. German Energy Solutions Initiative, 2020
[2] BOGDANOV D, RAM M, AGHAHOSSEINI A, et al. Low-cost renewable electricity as the key driver of the global energy transition towards sustainability[J]. Energy, 2021, 227: 120467
[3] LōBRE É, STRINGER M, SVOBODOVA K, et al. The social and environmental complexities of extracting energy transition metals[J]. Nature Communications, 2020, 11(1): 4823
[4] HERRINGTON R. Mining our green future[J]. Nature Reviews Materials, 2021, 6(6): 456-458
[5] BAMANA G, MILLER J D, YOUNG S L, et al. Addressing the social life cycle inventory analysis data gap: Insights from a case study of cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo[J]. One Earth, 2021, 4(12): 1704-1714
[6] HU S, GUO B, DING S, et al. A comprehensive review of alkaline water electrolysis mathematical modeling[J]. Applied Energy, 2022, 327: 120099
[7] URSUA A, GANDIA L M, SANCHIS P. Hydrogen production from water electrolysis: Current status and future trends[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2012, 100(2): 410-426
[8] CHEN Z, KUMAR S S, RAMAKRISHNA S, et al. Synthesis of polysulfone and zirconium oxide coated asbestos composite separators for alkaline water electrolysis[J]. Int J Chem Eng Process Technol, 2017, 3: 1035
[9] 郭雅婷, 邓甜音, 刘艳莹, 等. 碱性电解水制氢隔膜和阳极材料性能研究[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(5):64-68 GUO Yating, DENG Tianyin, LIU Yanying, et al. Research on the performance of membranes and anode materials in alkaline water electrolysis[J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2022, 44(5): 64-68(in Chinese)
[10] 杨成玉, 马军, 李广玉, 等. 大型碱性电解水制氢装备多对一的应用与实践[J]. 太阳能, 2022(5): 103-114 YANG Chengyu, MA Jun, LI Guangyu, et al. Application and practice of many-to-one large-scale alkaline water electrolysis hydrogen production equipment[J]. Solar Energy, 2022(5): 103-114(in Chinese)
[11] SHIVA KUMAR S, HIMABINDU V. Hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis-A review[J]. Materials Science for Energy Technologies, 2019, 2(3): 442-454
[12] ZENG Y, ZHANG H, WANG Z, et al. Nano-engineering of a 3D-ordered membrane electrode assembly with ultrathin Pt skin on open-walled PdCo nanotube arrays for fuel cells[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2018, 6(15): 6521-6533
[13] KANG Z, YANG G, MO J, et al. Novel thin/tunable gas diffusion electrodes with ultra-low catalyst loading for hydrogen evolution reactions in proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cells[J]. Nano Energy, 2018, 47: 434-441
[14] KUSOGLU A, WEBER A Z. New insights into perfluorinated sulfonic-acid ionomers[J]. Chemical Reviews, 2017, 117(3): 987-1104
[15] KIBSGAARD J, CHORKENDORFF I. Considerations for the scaling-up of water splitting catalysts[J]. Nature Energy, 2019, 4(6): 430-433
[16] LI A, SUN Y, YAO T, et al. Earth-abundant transition-metal-based electrocatalysts for water electrolysis to produce renewable hydrogen[J]. Chemistry (Weinheim an Der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2018, 24(69): 18334-18355
[17] KARI J, OLSEN J P, JENSEN K, et al. Sabatier principle for interfacial (heterogeneous) enzyme catalysis[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2018, 8(12): 11966-11972
[18] KEMPPAINEN E, BODIN A, SEBOK B, et al. Scalability and feasibility of photoelectrochemical H₂ evolution: The ultimate limit of Pt nanoparticle as an HER catalyst[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2015, 8(10): 2991-2999
[19] XU H, SHANG H, WANG C, et al. Ultrafine Pt-based nanowires for advanced catalysis[J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2020, 30(28): 2000793
[20] CHENG X, LI Y, ZHENG L, et al. Highly active, stable oxidized platinum clusters as electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2017, 10(11): 2450-2458
[21] SHIRVANIAN P, VAN BERKEL F. Novel components in Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Water Electrolyzers (PEMWE): Status, challenges and future needs. A mini review[J]. Electrochemistry Communications, 2020, 114: 106704
[22] WANG J, JI Y, YIN R, et al. Transition metal-doped ultrathin RuO₂ networked nanowires for efficient overall water splitting across a broad pH range[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2019, 7(11): 6411-6416
[23] LIN Y, TIAN Z, ZHANG L, et al. Chromium-ruthenium oxide solid solution electrocatalyst for highly efficient oxygen evolution reaction in acidic media[J]. Nature Communications, 2019, 10(1): 1-13
[24] DU K, ZHANG L, SHAN J, et al. Interface engineering breaks both stability and activity limits of RuO₂ for sustainable water oxidation[J]. Nature Communications, 2022, 13(1): 1-9
[25] WILBERFORCE T, IJAODOLA O, OGUNGBEMI E, et al. Technical evaluation of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell performance-A review of the effects of bipolar plates coating[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, 113: 109286
[26] LEE S J, HUANG C, CHEN Y. Investigation of PVD coating on corrosion resistance of metallic bipolar plates in PEM fuel cell[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2003, 140(1/2/3): 688-693
[27] BORUP R L, VANDERBORGH N E. Design and testing criteria for bipolar plate materials for PEM fuel cell applications[J]. MRS Proceedings, 1995, 393(1): 151
[28] ROJAS N, SÁNCHEZ-MOLINA M, SEVILLA G, et al. Coated stainless steels evaluation for bipolar plates in PEM water electrolysis conditions[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(51): 25929-25943
[29] HUBERT M A, KING L A, JARAMILLO T F. Evaluating the case for reduced precious metal catalysts in proton exchange membrane electrolyzers[J]. ACS Energy Letters, 2022, 7(1): 17-23
[30] SHIRVANIAN P, LOH A, SLUIJTER S, et al. Novel components in anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers (AEMWE’s): Status, challenges and future needs. A mini review[J]. Electrochemistry Communications, 2021, 132: 107140
[31] YU J, ZHONG Y, WU X, et al. Bifunctionality from synergy: CoP nanoparticles embedded in amorphous CoO_x nanoplates with heterostructures for highly efficient water electrolysis[J]. Advanced Science, 2018, 5(9): 1800514
[32] SUN H, YAN Z, LIU F, et al. Self-supported transition-metal-based electrocatalysts for hydrogen and oxygen evolution[J]. Advanced Materials, 2020, 32(3): 1806326
[33] WAN L, XU Z, XU Q, et al. Key components and design strategy of the membrane electrode assembly for alkaline water electrolysis[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2023, 16(4): 1384-1430
[34] RAZMJOOEI F, MORAWIETZ T, TAGHIZADEH E, et al. Increasing the performance of an anion-exchange membrane electrolyzer operating in pure water with a nickel-based microporous layer[J]. Joule, 2021, 5(7): 1776-1799
[35] 张微. 制氢技术进展及经济性分析[J]. 当代石油石化, 2022, 30(7):31-36 ZHANG Wei. The progress and economic analysis of hydrogen production technology[J]. Petroleum & Petrochemical Today, 2022, 30(7): 31-36(in Chinese)
[36] 牟树君, 林今, 邢学韬, 等. 高温固体氧化物电解水制氢储能技术及应用展望[J]. 电网技术, 2017, 41(10): 3385-3391 MOU Shujun, LIN Jin, XING Xuetao, et al. Technology and application prospect of high-temperature solid oxide electrolysis cell[J]. Power System Technology, 2017, 41(10): 3385-3391(in Chinese)
[37] 张文强, 于波. 高温固体氧化物电解制氢技术发展现状与展望[J]. 电化学, 2020, 26(2): 212-229 ZHANG Wenqiang, YU Bo. Development status and prospects of hydrogen production by high temperature solid oxide electrolysis[J]. Journal of Electrochemistry, 2020, 26(2): 212-229(in Chinese)
[38] HEBLING C, RAGWITZ M, FLEITER T, et al. A hydrogen roadmap for Germany[J]. Fraunhofer ISI & ISE, Karlsruhe and Freiburg, 2019
[39] SI D, XIONG B, CHEN L, et al. Highly selective and efficient electrocatalytic synthesis of glycolic acid in coupling with hydrogen evolution[J]. Chem Catalysis, 2021, 1(4): 941-955
[40] WANG T, TAO L, ZHU X, et al. Combined anodic and cathodic hydrogen production from aldehyde oxidation and hydrogen evolution reaction[J]. Nature Catalysis, 2022, 5(1): 66-73