纳米气泡对有机溶液表观黏度的影响研究

文章导读

摘要为了研究纳米气泡(NB)对有机溶液表观黏度的影响,利用无机陶瓷膜在溶液中产生纳米气泡后监测溶液的表观黏度变化,并利用计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟计算溶液内鼓入纳米气泡后表观黏度的变化情况以验证实验结果。实验结果表明:0.3 MPa压力下,纳米气泡的粒径分布在125~425 nm范围内,且液面纳米气泡的存在使水的平均表面张力从72.0减小至68.1 mN·m^-1。此外,经30 min鼓泡处理后,水、牛血清白蛋白(BSA)和海藻酸钠(SA)溶液的表观黏度分别从1.07、1.3和2.27 mPa·s减小至1.01、1.24和2.21 mPa·s,且随着纳米气泡浓度的增大,溶液的表观黏度持续降低。采用计算流体动力学种群耦合模型(CFD-PBM)模拟计算后溶液表观黏度的变化趋势与实验结果相一致,证实了纳米气泡在降低溶液表观黏度方面的效用。

	Service

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	Email Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	郭幸斐
	晁淑琳
	黄亚琪

关键词：纳米气泡表观黏度粒径分布表面张力 CFD-PBM

Abstract： In order to investigate the effect of nanobubbles (NB) on the apparent viscosity of organic liquids, inorganic ceramic membranes were used to generate NB in solutions to monitor the apparent viscosity variations of liquids. CFD was used to simulate the variations of apparent viscosity of solutions with NB verify the experimental results. The experimental results show that the particle size distribution of NB is in the range of 125—425 nm at 0.3 MPa and average surface tension of H₂O decreases from 72.0 to 68.1 mN·m^-1 in the presence of NB at the liquid surface. In addition, after bubbling time of 30 min the apparent viscosity of H₂O, BSA solution and SA solution decrease from 1.07, 1.3 and 2.27 to 1.01, 1.24 and 2.27 mPa·s, respectively. The apparent viscosity of the solutions continues to decrease with increasing NB concentration. The simulations by the CFD-PBM coupled model show that the variations of the apparent viscosity of solutions are consistent with the experimental results, confirming the effectiveness of NB in reducing the apparent viscosity of liquids.

Keywords： nanobubbles apparent viscosity particle size distribution surface tension CFD-PBM

Received 2023-02-24;

Fund:国家自然科学基金重点基金(51638011)。

Corresponding Authors: 郭幸斐,副教授,E-mail:feifei_0630@sina.com。 Email: feifei_0630@sina.com

About author: 郭幸斐(1982-),男,硕士研究生,副教授,现从事纳米气泡应用及CFD模拟方面的研究。

引用本文:

郭幸斐, 晁淑琳, 黄亚琪.纳米气泡对有机溶液表观黏度的影响研究[J]. 化学工业与工程, 2023,40(6): 144-150

GUO Xingfei, CHAO Shulin, HUANG Yaqi.Effect of nanobubbles on the apparent viscosity of organic solutions[J]. Chemcial Industry and Engineering, 2023,40(6): 144-150

[1] ATKINSON A J, APUL O G, SCHNEIDER O, et al. Nanobubble technologies offer opportunities to improve water treatment[J]. Accounts of Chemical Research, 2019, 52(5): 1196-1205
[2] JADHAV A J, BARIGOU M. Bulk nanobubbles or not nanobubbles: That is the question[J]. Langmuir, 2020, 36(7): 1699-1708
[3] LIU S, KAWAGOE Y, MAKINO Y, et al. Effects of nanobubbles on the physicochemical properties of water: The basis for peculiar properties of water containing nanobubbles[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2013, 93: 250-256
[4] NIRMALKAR N, PACEK A W, BARIGOU M. On the existence and stability of bulk nanobubbles[J]. Langmuir: the ACS Journal of Surfaces and Colloids, 2018, 34(37): 10964-10973
[5] SOYLUOGLU M, KIM D, ZAKER Y, et al. Stability of oxygen nanobubbles under freshwater conditions[J]. Water Research, 2021, 206: 117749
[6] HEWAGE S A, KEWALRAMANI J, MEEGODA J N. Stability of nanobubbles in different salts solutions[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2021, 609: 125669
[7] TEMESGEN T, BUI T T, HAN M, et al. Micro and nanobubble technologies as a new horizon for water-treatment techniques: A review[J]. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2017, 246: 40-51
[8] FAN W, CUI J, LI Q, et al. Bactericidal efficiency and photochemical mechanisms of micro/nano bubble-enhanced visible light photocatalytic water disinfection[J]. Water Research, 2021, 203: 117531
[9] ROSA A F, RUBIO J. On the role of nanobubbles in particle-bubble adhesion for the flotation of quartz and apatitic minerals[J]. Minerals Engineering, 2018, 127: 178-184
[10] FAN M, TAO D, HONAKER R, et al. Nanobubble generation and its application in froth flotation (part I): Nanobubble generation and its effects on properties of microbubble and millimeter scale bubble solutions[J]. Mining Science and Technology (China), 2010, 20(1): 1-19
[11] 李香香, 韩煦. 微纳米气泡对超滤膜过滤腐植酸污染影响研究[J]. 化学工业与工程, 2022, 39(6): 101-108 LI Xiangxiang, HAN Xu. Effect of micro-nano bubbles on humic acid fouling of ultrafiltration membrane[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering, 2022, 39(6): 101-108(in Chinese)
[12] ALIAS E A, HAGOS F Y, ISHAK M I, et al. Performance and emission characteristics of microbubble-enhanced fuels in a diesel engine[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2021, 35(3): 2630-2638
[13] AWAD M M, MUZYCHKA Y S. Effective property models for homogeneous two-phase flows[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2008, 33(1): 106-113
[14] BEATTIE D R H, WHALLEY P B. A simple two-phase frictional pressure drop calculation method[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1982, 8(1):83-87
[15] LI X, GUO X, ZHANG M, et al. Enhanced permeate flux by air micro-nano bubbles via reducing apparent viscosity during ultrafiltration process[J]. Chemosphere, 2022, 302: 134782
[16] WANG T, WANG J, JIN Y. A CFD-PBM coupled model for gas-liquid flows[J]. AIChE Journal, 2006, 52(1): 125-140
[17] ZHANG H, GUO K, WANG Y, et al. Numerical simulations of the effect of liquid viscosity on gas-liquid mass transfer of a bubble column with a CFD-PBM coupled model[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, 161: 120229
[18] ALAM H S, SUTIKNO P, AHMAD FAUZI SOELAIMAN T, et al. CFD-PBM Coupled modeling of bubble size distribution in a swirling-flow nanobubble generator[J]. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 2022, 16(1): 677-693
[19] AHMED A K A, SUN C, HUA L, et al. Generation of nanobubbles by ceramic membrane filters: The dependence of bubble size and zeta potential on surface coating, pore size and injected gas pressure[J]. Chemosphere, 2018, 203: 327-335
[20] AFZAL M U, KANG I. A numerical study on bubble detachment from solid wall and formation of jet inside detached bubble[J]. International Journal of Chemical Engineering and Applications, 2012: 40-43
[21] YASUI K, TUZIUTI T, IZU N, et al. Is surface tension reduced by nanobubbles (ultrafine bubbles) generated by cavitation?[J]. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2019, 52: 13-18
[22] KATIYAR A, SARKAR K. Stability analysis of an encapsulated microbubble against gas diffusion[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2010, 343(1): 42-47