压力延迟渗透发电技术的影响因素探究

摘要

压力延迟渗透技术作为提取盐差能的一种有效方法，已在海洋新能源开发方面展现出巨大潜力，提高盐差能发电效率是目前压力延迟渗透技术尚需解决的重要问题之一。以压力延迟渗透过程膜的水通量和功率密度为评价指标，重点研究了料液流动方式、流速和浓度等因素对压力延迟渗透过程性能的影响。结果表明，采用逆流方式、增大浓度差、提高流速均有利于提高压力延迟渗透过程中的水通量和功率密度，其中，单侧增加原料液浓度，水通量和功率密度均呈逐渐降低趋势；单侧增加驱动液浓度，水通量和功率密度均呈逐渐上升趋势。选取河水-正渗透浓盐水模拟体系，采用逆流操作，在压力差为1 200 kPa条件下，提升原料液流速效果更优；驱动液流速为1.0 L·min^-1，原料液流速从0.5 L·min^-1提升到2.0 L·min^-1时，水通量提升了17.3%，功率密度也从8.01 W·m^-2增加到9.39 W·m^-2。

	Service

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	Email Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	刘艳秋
	王越
	段亚威
	张梦轲
	徐世昌

关键词：压力延迟渗透盐差能水通量功率密度反向盐通量

Abstract：

Pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) technology, as an effective method for harvesting energy from the salinity gradients, has shown great potential in the development of new ocean energy. At present, the improvement of power generation efficiency for the PRO is one of the most important issues to be solved. In this paper, the influences of flow direction, solution concentration and flow velocity on the PRO performances were mainly investigated and evaluated in term of the water flux and power density. And results show that it is beneficial to improving the PRO process water flux and power density by applying the counter-current flow mode, raising the concentration difference across the membrane and increasing the flow velocity. What's more, by unilaterally increasing the feed solution concentration, water flux and power density decrease with increasing feed solution concentration; by unilaterally increasing the draw solution concentration, the water flux and power density increase with increasing draw solution concentration. This paper also chooses the river water-forward osmosis brine simulation system and the results indicate that it is more effective to enhance the feed solution flow velocity by using the counter-current mode under the pressure of 1 200 kPa. And when the draw solution flow velocity is 1.0 L·min^-1, the water flux increased by 17.3% as the feed solution flow velocity increased from 0.5 L·min^-1 to 2.0 L·min^-1, and the power density also increased from 8.01 W·m^-2 to 9.39 W·m^-2.

Keywords： pressure retarded osmosis； salinity gradient energy； water flux； power density； reverse salt flux

Received 2016-04-27;

Fund:

天津市海洋经济创新发展区域示范项目（CXSF2014-10）。

Corresponding Authors: 王越,E-mail:tdwy75@tju.edu.cn。 Email: tdwy75@tju.edu.cn

About author: 刘艳秋(1990-),女,研究生硕士,现从事压力延迟渗透发电技术方面的研究。

引用本文:

刘艳秋, 王越, 段亚威, 张梦轲, 徐世昌.压力延迟渗透发电技术的影响因素探究[J]. 化学工业与工程, 2018,35(1): 56-62

Liu Yanqiu, Wang Yue, Duan Yawei, Zhang Mengke, Xu Shichang.Influencing Factors in Power Generation of Pressure Retarded Osmosis Process[J]. Chemcial Industry and Engineering, 2018,35(1): 56-62

[1] Helfer F, Lemckert C, Anissimov Y G. Osmotic power with pressure retarded osmosis:Theory, performance and trends-A review[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2014, 453(3):337-358
[2] Pattle R E. Production of electric power by mixing fresh and salt water in the hydroelectric pile[J]. Nature, 1954, 174(4431):660-660
[3] Logan B E, Elimelech M. Membrane-Based processes for sustainable power generation using water[J]. Nature, 2012, 488(7411):313-319
[4] Loeb S, Norman R S. Osmotic power plants.[J]. Science, 1975, 189(189):654-655
[5] 虞源,吴青芸,陈忠仁. 压力延迟渗透膜技术[J]. 化学进展, 2015, (12):1822-1832 Yu Yuan, Wu Qingyun, Chen Zhongren. Pressure retarded osmosis membrane technology[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2015, (12):1822-1832(in Chinese)
[6] Cui Y, Liu X, Chung T S. Enhanced osmotic energy generation from salinity gradients by modifying thin film composite membranes[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2014, 242(8):195-203
[7] Chou S, Wang R, Shi L, et al. Thin-Film composite hollow fiber membranes for pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) process with high power density[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2012, 389(4):25-33
[8] Kim Y C, Elimelech M. Potential of osmotic power generation by pressure retarded osmosis using seawater as feed solution:Analysis and experiments[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, 429(2):330-337
[9] Yip N Y, Elimelech M. Performance limiting effects in power generation from salinity gradients by pressure retarded osmosis[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(23):10273-10282
[10] Kim Y C, Lee J H, Park S J. Novel crossflow membrane cell with asymmetric channels:Design and pressure-retarded osmosis performance test[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 476:76-86
[11] Aaberg R J. Osmotic power:A new and powerful renewable energy source?[J]. Refocus, 2003, 4(6):48-50
[12] Bazhin N M. Water flux in pressure retarded osmosis[J]. Desalination, 2015, 375:21-23
[13] Phillip W A, Yong J S, Elimelech M. Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis:Modeling and experiments[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(13):5170-5176
[14] Achilli A, Childress A E. Pressure retarded osmosis:From the vision of Sidney Loeb to the first prototype installation-Review[J]. Desalination, 2010, 261(3):205-211
[15] McCutcheon J R, Elimelech M. Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 284(1/2):237-247
[16] Yip N Y, Elimelech M. Thermodynamic and energy efficiency analysis of power generation from natural salinity gradients by pressure retarded osmosis[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(9):5230-5239
[17] Altaee A, Hilal N. Dual-Stage forward osmosis/pressure retarded osmosis process for hypersaline solutions and fracking wastewater treatment[J]. Desalination, 2014, 350:79-85
[18] Achilli A, Prante J L, Hancock N T, et al. Experimental results from RO-PRO:A next generation system for low-energy desalination[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48(11):6437-6443
[19] Achilli A, Cath T Y, Childress A E. Power generation with pressure retarded osmosis:An experimental and theoretical investigation[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2009, 343(1/2):42-52
[20] McCutcheon J R, Elimelech M. Modeling water flux in forward osmosis:Implications for improved membrane design[J]. AIChE Journal, 2007, 53(7):1736-1744